A possible explanation for the holdup in the Dempster deal
Is it possible that the Braves’ demands and not Ryan Dempster’s are holding up his trade from the Chicago Cubs to Atlanta?
Yes, and here’s how, based on what I know, and also upon my own speculation:
Dempster, as a player with 10 years of major-league service, the last five with the same team, has the right to veto any trade. He also can ask for a contract extension or some other financial inducement in exchange for waiving his no-trade rights.
Free agency awaits Dempster at the end of the season, and he currently leads the National League with a 2.11 ERA. He is not necessarily interested in an extension, according to a source with knowledge of his thinking. But the Braves could – repeat, could – push for such an arrangement, even making it a condition of the deal.
Follow the logs:
A Dempster trade from the Cubs to the Braves likely would involve a significant amount of cash going to Atlanta to cover the remaining portion of Dempster’s salary. In exchange, the Cubs would want a better prospect – reportedly, Braves right-hander Randall Delgado. And the Braves, to give up a better prospect, might want Dempster for more than the final two months of the season.
Dempster likes the Braves – they are his second choice for a trade destination after the Dodgers, sources say. But that doesn’t necessarily mean he would want to sign an extension to remain in Atlanta. His long-term preference, according to one source, is to join a team that trains in Arizona. The Braves train in Florida.
I don’t know that the above scenario actually is taking place. I just know that this is one possible explanation for the holdup in this trade.
-Ken Rosenthal


